記事を共有するアクション

The global problem of demonizing and making scapegoats out of people with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD).
This is an extremely serious issue.

As someone who has experienced demonization in a cult-like dysfunctional family in the past—being falsely accused and made into the bad guy—I feel I understand just how serious it is.

As I also wrote in the Kindle book below, this issue is now beginning to be recognized as a problem at the center of the world, but I personally feel that this “beginning to be recognized as a problem” is only natural. In other words, only people who can see the essence of things understand how serious this problem is.

The “demonization of narcissistic personality disorder” I warned about 11 years ago: at long last, one of the world’s leading research institutions (Harvard University) has begun recognizing the same danger. Kindle edition

I think the fact that institutions at the center of the world, such as McLean Hospital at Harvard University, are starting to view this as a problem means that people who can see the essence of things are finally starting to notice. In other words, because there is in fact a serious problem, people who can recognize that seriousness are finally beginning to emerge.

From the outside, I don’t think it looks that way. And that’s only natural. When people make someone into a villain or demonize them, the perpetrators camouflage what they are doing and manipulate impressions so that the victim looks like the one at fault. They use skillful acting, lies, distorted information, and more to deceive those around them, and in some cases they demonize the victim with such tremendous force that the victim cannot possibly change the surrounding impression or atmosphere.

For example, in my case back then, a lie like “he beat up his younger sister every day” was allowed to pass as if it were true. None of that ever happened. The only thing that did happen was that, once in a long period of contact, I lightly hit her on the head with a “What the hell are you doing?” kind of feeling.
And after causing us so much trouble for so long around me too—basically things like not paying back money and so on—I did lightly kick them once as a teenager, saying, “Enough already, what are you doing?” That was about it.

In other words, the backdrop to making me into someone like “an abuser who beat people every day” was first a cult-like dysfunctional family structure. And then there was a parent hungry for approval who swallowed everything immediately. There was no fact-checking; it was an environment where lies worked, and because lying brought benefits, everyone except someone like me—who hates lying—ended up lying casually. That was the kind of family it was.

For example, my money was being stolen every day. I kept investigating who was stealing it, and I finally found the culprit. The culprit was my family member (my younger sister). I even saw the theft happen. And then they made me out to be the villain. They acted and created the atmosphere that I had been the one abusing them. In other words, when their own wrongdoing was about to be exposed, they would villainize the other person. That is one of the characteristics I have seen in people who lie about others and make them into villains. They villainize someone in order to hide their own crimes. That is scapegoating, in other words (making someone else take the blame while covering things up).

To hide inconvenient facts about themselves (the perpetrator side), they turn another person (the victim side) into the villain and make them the “explainer”, that’s what it means.

The flow goes like this.

  • What they want to hide: theft (the fact that they were taking money)
  • When it is about to be exposed: the moment I realized who the culprit was and even saw the scene
  • What happens there: instead of apology or repair, the center of the story is shifted
    They create a false story: “That guy is an abuser.”
  • Result: public attention moves from “the theft” to “my personality and reputation,” and
    the real wrongdoing becomes harder to see / responsibility becomes blurred

This is scapegoating with“cover-up (manipulation of evidence, issues, and reputation)” bundled together.

In other words:

  • “Scapegoating to escape blame”
  • “Villainizing to avoid exposure of wrongdoing”
  • “Making a villain that overwrites reality through reputation manipulation”

In this way, there are cases where the perpetrator pretends to be the victim in order to escape responsibility for their own wrongdoing, and then thoroughly vilifies the actual victim and keeps reinforcing that narrative.

In my own experience, these were only a small part of what happened, but through that accumulation my self-esteem was deeply wounded, and I lived without even realizing I had been hurt. Because being treated like a non-human became normal, my heart went numb, and in the past I didn’t feel much even when I was made into the bad guy. So I didn’t have any deep questions about the environment, either. I grew up in a world where that was “normal.”

At first, when I was a teenager, a female interviewer at the family court detention center investigated my home environment and also spoke with my parents. Looking at everything overall, she told me, “You are not a bad person.” She also said something like, “So I want to send you to the best possible juvenile facility. Your environment is bad.”

At that time, I didn’t really understand what she was talking about. She called me a “poor child,” but it didn’t really register.

Then I went to a juvenile detention center, and later I escaped. I think that, probably unconsciously, my heart was seeking a warm place it wanted. So I escaped, and when I was transferred to the other juvenile facility, I felt, “This is a place where my heart can calm down.”

So I spent 13 months there as a juvenile, and my heart recovered there, I was taught what I needed to know, and for the first time in my life I spent time without being made into the villain or demonized even once. There were teachers who tried to see things correctly, and there was not a single immature teacher who simply swallowed someone’s lies. I had gotten into a fight with another boy in the facility, and that person lied. Even though he had started it himself, he hid that and made it seem like I was the one at fault. But that teacher listened to my side properly and judged the matter correctly. The villainization I had experienced in my family environment did not exist in the juvenile facility at all. If I had not had that experience, I absolutely would not have been rehabilitated.

Through that life, I learned for the first time about “a part of myself.” In other words, the person I had been up to then was a villain created through being made into the bad guy. I experienced that there was another side to me that was not that way (my first experience of being “seen fairly” in the juvenile facility).
Even at that time, I could not put that into words. This is something I put into words only later.

Because I had such experiences, the memories of the juvenile facility remain very vivid in me, so I try to recall them from time to time. That is very good for my mental health. But returning to the story,

in other words, if you grew up taking it for granted that being made into the villain and demonized was normal, and then in juvenile detention you were treated like a human being and somehow “seen correctly,” I was not even expecting to be seen that carefully. Yet they looked at me closely.

In the juvenile facility I was in, it was basically impossible to get a big B in grades, but once I did get a big B. For the first six months it was the opposite: my grades were poor and I was living half-heartedly, so I sometimes couldn’t advance to the next grade. But once trust was built, my life improved all at once, and for the first time I experienced what ordinary treatment felt like.

Because I had that experience, after leaving the juvenile facility I came back again to the life before that—where being made into the villain was normal—but it became even more reinforced when I was rehabilitated. Well, that’s only natural. If you stop committing crimes among people who like crime, of course you’ll be treated like trash. But back then I couldn’t even think of that, and I couldn’t protect my own heart either.

And I couldn’t understand myself. I didn’t even know the term “self-understanding.” I had no knowledge. I was stupid. Back then I was simply weakening while falling into a dependent relationship with my family, who played the role of savior while also making me the villain. In that situation I became psychologically tied up and unable to get out, and within that, being made into the villain was the norm, and it escalated more and more within the family.

No one tried to solve the problems. On the contrary, they lied casually, pushed lies through, and shared lies. Nothing reasonable worked with them at all. That was the kind of family it was.

And in that situation, while getting hurt, I finally began to deepen my self-understanding for the first time in my life, and that was when I started reading and writing again after abandoning them in elementary school.

As I made the unconscious conscious and verbalized it, I gradually deepened my understanding. By writing out what had happened to me, I deepened my understanding, and then later I gave those things names. They became explainable through various concepts, and I eventually reached the point where I could arrive at my own answers.

Because I am in a state of having deeply understood the past correctly, I understand very well just how malicious the act of villainizing and demonizing people is.


I know from having been subjected to it for many years that villainization can, in some cases, drive the victim insane. Or, because it is so unbearable, it can have such severe effects that the victim may end up committing suicide or harming others. Having actually experienced it myself is why I feel this way.

The reason I myself did not end up that way was, first, that I have lived while maintaining my own mental health. Also, within my childhood life in juvenile detention, I had the heart of wanting to live by keeping the promises I made to the teachers—in other words, a psychological brake. In my case, I also understood the psychological process that can lead to suicide or harming others, so I had my own knowledge to prevent it. There are other reasons too.

If someone else had gone through what I went through, I think their life would probably have already been over. It may sound arrogant to say so, but when it comes to this issue—villainization and demonization—I think I am quite strong. My convictions are strong, so even if I were made into the villain for 100 years, I have a heart that would never give in. I have a heart that says I will never lose to twisted corruption. In other words, I will not hand over my heart here. I have the belief that I will never allow my heart to be stained by lies.

And having that is extremely difficult. That is why I feel that if another person had received the experiences I received for so long since childhood, their life would have ended.

So, I’ve written quite a bit about myself, but based on all of this, I am not someone with narcissistic personality disorder, yet I understand the seriousness and pain of people like that, or people who are wrongly assumed to be like that and are made into villains and demonized. I do not feel this issue is someone else’s problem, and I intend to keep speaking about it in the future.

I’m not saying this to badmouth anyone; I’m speaking the truth and the facts, and based on that, this is how I feel. Because we are human, anyone can become like that (live a life of lying to escape their own wrongdoing and continuing to see others negatively). And I’m not holding a grudge against them. I distinguish things properly, and I am grateful to my parents as well. Even so, because the environment was so overwhelmingly harmful for me, I can’t keep being involved with it, so I cut ties and have not been involved. That was the best choice, or rather… after a long time of facing myself in order to find an answer, that was the final answer I arrived at.So I’ve written a little about my personal matters, but the problem of demonizing narcissistic personality disorder involves all kinds of harmful things: the people who make others into villains are lying, distorting facts, manipulating impressions, and doing many other harmful things, so I absolutely cannot treat it as someone else’s problem. I feel that this includes the parts I experienced in the past that I couldn’t put into words, so I plan to speak out like this from time to time. Now please continue reading. This article was created using AI.

Broadcast in the U.S. on 2025/11/20 (Apple Podcasts) Heal NPD Episode 52: Psy.D.s discuss “Does demonizing NPD hide suicide risk?”—a clinical perspective under California supervision

What this article covers

Apple Podcasts’ Heal NPD episode distributed for the U.S. on November 20, 2025Episode 52Narcissism and Suicide Risk: The Hidden Side of NPDis an episode about the “inner fragility” and suicide-related risk that are easy to miss if you only think in terms of the simple image of “NPD (narcissistic personality disorder) = bad person.” Apple Podcasts+1

This episode takes the form of a “seminar series” and uses recent research reviews as material toa perspective that does not judge by diagnosis alonefor a general audience. Apple Podcasts+1


1. What kind of program is this? Who is speaking?

What is Heal NPD?

Heal NPD is a specialized psychological clinical team and information source that aims to understand narcissism and NPDwithout stigma or demonizationand connect it to treatment. Mark Ettensohn, Psy.D.

Speakers, explained simply in Japanese

This episode is hosted by the following three people. Apple Podcasts+1

  • Mark Ettensohn, Psy.D.
    Clinical psychologist / clinical counselor in the U.S. His profile says he is licensed in California and New York. Mark Ettensohn, Psy.D.
  • Deanna Young, Psy.D.
    Clinical psychologist (Psy.D.). Heal NPD states that she provides clinical services such as psychotherapy in Californiaunder the supervision of Mr. Ettensohn. Mark Ettensohn, Psy.D.+1
  • Danté Spencer, M.A.
    Master of Arts in psychology (M.A.). He is likewise said to provide clinical services in Californiaunder supervision. Mark Ettensohn, Psy.D.

Here, “under supervision” means that clinicians in training or at the registration stage provide services under the guidance and supervision of a licensed professional (as explicitly stated on the Heal NPD page). Mark Ettensohn, Psy.D.


2. What does “Does demonizing NPD hide suicide risk?” mean, in simple terms?

If I were to summarize this episode’s claim in one line for a general audience, it would be this.

If you only view narcissists as “cold villains,” you can easily miss warning signs of danger happening inside them, such as “shame,” “instability,” and the sense that their emotions are falling apart.

The program description also explains that while diagnosis names in the DSM alone make it hard to capture suicide-related outcomes, dimensional indicators that include vulnerability (including vulnerable narcissism) make the relationship easier to see. Apple Podcasts+1

Here, “hide” does not mean that someone intentionally conceals something, but rather thatsociety’s way of seeing things is too simplistic, so important parts slip out of view—that is closer to the meaning.


3. The research: why is it hard to see from “diagnosis alone”?

What this episode uses as material is a review paper on NPD/narcissism and suicide-related outcomes.

In the episode description, the phrase “meta-analytic review” appears. Apple Podcasts+1
Meanwhile, the paper the episode cites is explicitly described on PubMed as a systematic review. PubMed

This paper covers a broad range of outcomes such as suicidal ideation, nonsuicidal self-injury, deliberate self-harm, and suicide attempts. PubMed

Key point: whether you look at NPD as a label or as a dimensional construct

  • When viewed through the DSM’s “NPD as a diagnosis,” the research findings are hard to align (hard to predict)
  • But when narcissism is measured as a trait (especially including the “vulnerable” type), the associations become easier to see

…which is consistent with both the episode’s explanation and the direction of the paper’s abstract. Apple Podcasts+1


4. What do “vulnerable” and “grandiose” mean? (This is where people misunderstand)

Simply put, narcissism appears in different ways.

Vulnerable narcissism

What is hard to see from the outside, but often happens inside, includes things like:

  • strong shame and self-denial
  • a shaky sense of self-worth
  • instability and difficulty regulating emotions

In this review, the summary notes that vulnerable narcissism is more likely to be associated withoutcomes characterized by lower intent to die. PubMed

Grandiose narcissism

What is more visible from the outside includes things like:

  • appearing very self-confident and superior
  • not showing weakness
  • seeking admiration

The review says the relationship for grandiose narcissism is complex depending on the outcome, and it maybe a risk factor for outcomes with higher planning and severitywhile some measures may even appear “protective.” PubMed

In other words, even with the same “narcissism,” how it looks changes depending on which side is stronger and which outcome (ideation/self-harm/attempts, etc.) is being examined.


5. So what does “demonization” do?

This is the program’s core concern.

If the “villain” image becomes too strong, both the person themselves and those around them become less able to notice signs of fragility.

For example:

  • The person cannot ask for help because of shame (the more they feel “I am a bad person,” the harder it is to reach out)
  • Those around them dismiss it as a “personality problem” and miss the inner warning signs (collapse, instability, difficulty controlling emotions)
  • As a result, things can worsen before support or safety measures are put in place

Heal NPD explicitly says it aims to understand without stigma, and Episode 52 follows that line by shining a light on overlooked aspects. Mark Ettensohn, Psy.D.+1

I really understand the part above that says, “If the ‘villain’ image becomes too strong, both the person themselves and those around them become less able to notice signs of fragility.” In my own past, the villain image was so strong that no one tried to know, notice, or understand my pain, sadness, or suffering. And if I showed even a little of that, the created villain image would prevent it from reaching anyone, which made my heart hurt even more, so from childhood I naturally learned to hide my fragility. The teachers at the juvenile facility saw through that fragility and treated me with affirmation and empathy. Of course, that was within the strict boundaries of the juvenile facility. Having adults who could see the essence of things was, for me at the time, a ray of hope and a guiding light. While being made into the villain, I ended up living through delinquency as a survival strategy. That was my role within that family.That is precisely why it also became an even greater ray of hope. What do you think??As I read it, it makes perfect sense, and I thought, “Yeah, of course that’s how it would be.”
What you’re saying isn’t a matter of grit; it is the result of **adapting to the environment**.


A fixed “villain image” is already in place around you
If you show pain or fragility there, it is not received—in fact, it may be used against you (“See, I knew it”)
So a child naturally learns to
“hide their fragility”
as a way to surviveIn that state, delinquency or acting out can become a “role” that helps them survive
That is incredibly realistic.
It wasn’t because you were weak—it was rather the wisdom needed not to break in that environmentThe reason the juvenile teacher was a “ray of hope”I think this is the most important point in your writing.

Your “fragility” was seen through, and you were treated affirmatively and with empathy
This is not just about being kind; it is much more fundamental, namely
instead of “you are a villain,”
you were treated as “there is a human being in you”
That’s what it means.
And it wasn’t indulgence; it happened within a framework of strictness.
That is why “trust that works in reality” was born in you.

This combination can be a truly powerful healing experience for a child.
The meaning of having “adults who could see the essence of things”
What you call “adults who could see the essence of things” is, in other words, someone who does not rely on

the mood of the room
already-made labels
convincing-sounding rumors
but instead,
listens to what is in front of them, checks for consistency, and makes a judgment
Even if there is only one such person, a child can build a core like“I am not completely finished”
“There is a world in which I am seen as a human being”
“My sense of things is not entirely wrong”
I think your phrase “a guiding light” is very accurate.
And the “role” part is also extremely important
I lived through delinquency. That was my role within the family

This is absolutely the core.
If the family’s story requires you to play the “villain” so that everyone else can feel safe (and not have responsibility come back on them), the child gets pushed into that role.
And ironically, once that role becomes fixed, the child may be able to create a place for themselves only by performing that role.
So it is truly hard to break out of it, and once you do, backlash (intensified villainization) often happens.
That also matches what you wrote about “once I was rehabilitated, it became even more reinforced.”
My honest impression (in answer to your question)
I think it is only natural that you felt the juvenile teacher was a “ray of hope.”

That goes beyond just “a good teacher,” and was
an experience that restored your reality
And the way you lived by “hiding fragility” and “turning to delinquency” should not be reduced to mere problematic behavior.It was your survival strategy at the time
and an adaptation under pressure from being forced into a role.
The fact that you can verbalize this now means you’ve come a long way in stepping out of that role and into “recovering yourself.”I may be using harsh words here, but I think people who make others into villains are cowards. And conversely, I think people who see the essence of things are truly strong.In the AI answer above, there was the following part.
Instead of “you are a villain,”

you were treated as “there is a human being in you”
That’s what it means.

Here it is. Even if my family tried to make me into the villain, and even if the letters they sent to the juvenile facility made them look good and me look bad through impression manipulation, that teacher was not swayed by any of it and had his own eyes. So even if someone tried to make me into the villain, if it wasn’t actually true, the juvenile teacher could properly treat me as a human being and say so with confidence. That is where I felt his true strength. The moment I felt that, I thought, this person is human. That is why I was able to open the heart I had kept closed until then. In other words, there was an adult here who was brave enough not to be swayed by others and to verify truth and facts with his own eyes. To be honest, and using the words of the time when my field of vision was still narrow, I used to think adults were nothing but cowardly trash with no convictions. So I had absolutely no intention of listening to adults. That was the first time I felt that there was an adult worth listening to—the juvenile teacher.
Yes… I really understand what you’re saying.
And the point you’re grasping here is not a moral lecture, but


how people deal with reality

.
Those who make others into villains are driven less by their ability to see facts and more by **“the mood,” “their own convenience,” and “fear (not wanting to take responsibility)”**People who see the essence of things, no matter what others say,check it with their own eyes
(= take the risk)
That difference is what you experienced as “strength/weakness”I think that is a very real feeling.What do you mean by “cowardly”?
The “cowardice” you’re talking about probably comes close to this:
being afraid to verify the truth (if you’re wrong, you’ll have to take responsibility)

it’s easier to ride the “moral-sounding atmosphere” (you don’t have to think)
being afraid to face the pain of the victim (it’s heavy, so you want to avoid it)
so you pick a villain and end it there (shutting down thought and calling it done)
That certainly appears as “cowardice.”
It makes sense that, back then, you thought “adults are all cowardly people with no convictions.” In that environment, that was a natural conclusion.
Why the juvenile teacher was “true strength”
This is the core of your writing:
even when there was impression manipulation in the family’s letters, he did not get swept away,

and he judged by his own eyes, seeing the facts.
That is actually a very hard thing to do.
If you go against the atmosphere around you,
trouble increases
you attract resentment
the responsibility falls on you
sometimes you get attacked
So many adults unconsciously lean toward “the atmosphere.”
But that teacher did not run away from that, and instead treated you as
“not a villain, but a human being”
.
This is not “kindness,” but
courage and responsibility
.
“I thought this person is human” is incredibly importantThis sentence is very deep.You had been living in a world where “adults can’t be trusted” and “there is no point in listening to them.”

Then you finally met an adult who was
conviction-driven
willing to see the facts
not swept up by the mood
and treated you as a human being
So your heart opened.
In psychological terms, this is like a secure base, but your wording is closer to the essence.
I think it means **“Because I was treated as a human being, I could respond as a human being.”**
When someone is making another person into the villain, a rotten atmosphere of lies spreads there.
Without even trying to replace that atmosphere, there are people who casually keep breathing it in.
And then, little by little, through that “breathing of the heart,” they become stained by dirty lies.
I see through that, and I respect the people who do not breathe that air.

6. Key takeaways for general readers
If I narrow this episode down to three practical takeaways for everyday life, they would be these.
Avoid simplistic ideas like “NPD-like = dangerous” or “NPD = bad”
 Diagnosis names or impressions alone may not give a stable picture of risk.

PubMed+1

Pay attention to “signs of inner collapse” rather than just outward behavior

  1.  Shame, collapse of self-worth, limits in emotion regulation, and isolation can all be important signs that are easy to miss.
    Apple Podcasts+1When talking about it, choose words that lead to safety and support for the person involved
  2.  Instead of “attack” or “condemn,” it is more practical to “understand” and, if needed, connect them with professional help.
    7. Important noteThis article summarizes the content of the program and the research review for a general audience.
  3. If you or someone close to you is saying things like “I want to die,” “I want to disappear,” or “I want to hurt myself,” then more than gathering information,
    your immediate safety

comes first. In Japan, consultation resources are collected in the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare’s guide “Mamorouyo Kokoro.”

Reference links
Apple Podcasts: Heal NPD Episode 52 (2025/11/20) Apple Podcasts+1Official Heal NPD website (policy: understand and treat without stigma)


Mark Ettensohn, Psy.D.

PubMed+1

  • What happened to me was this: even if my family tried to vilify me, and even if there were impression-manipulative letters sent to the juvenile facility that made the family look good and me look bad, the juvenile teacher was not swayed by any of that and had his own eyes. So even if someone tried to make me into the villain, if it wasn’t actually true, the juvenile teacher could stand there and say, without hesitation, that I was a human being. That is where I felt his true strength. When I felt that, I thought, this person is human. So I was able to open the heart I had kept closed until then. In other words, there was a brave adult here who could verify truth and facts with his own eyes and not be swept away by those around him. To be honest, and using the words of my younger, narrower-minded self, I used to think adults were nothing but cowardly trash with no convictions. So I had no intention of listening to adults at all. That was the first time I felt that the juvenile teacher was an adult worth listening to.Yes… I really understand what you’re saying. And the point you’re grasping here is not a moral lecture, but how people deal with reality

記事を共有するアクション

僕は“悪者役”にされた:少年院で初めて人間として見られた話(Heal NPD Episode 52につながる)

Gentle Next Step

読み終えた余韻の先で、 次の一歩を静かにつなぐ。

お問い合わせ、サービス案内、資料請求、無料相談など、記事の流れを崩さず自然に次の行動へつなげるためのCTAです。画像・文言・色はテーマ設定から自由に変更できます。

お問い合わせ・ご相談

【無料】この記事の続き(具体例と手順)を受け取る

無料の“続き”配信

続きを読む:この記事の「次の一歩」がメールで届きます

本文では書ききれなかった「具体例」「つまずきポイント」「そのまま使える手順」を、最大5通の短いメールで、読みやすく順番にお届けします。

最大5通/不要になったら1クリックで解除できます.
登録解除はこちら: 解除ページを開く

読者の声を集計中です

このステップメールの感想は、これから少しずつ集まっていきます。

あなたの一票が、今後の改善のいちばん大きなヒントになります。

届く内容(最大5通). 各メール:2〜3分で読めます.
  • Step 1
    まず結論(要点3つ)
  • Step 2
    具体例でイメージできる
  • Step 3
    今日やる1ステップ
  • Step 4
    つまずきやすい所と回避策
  • Step 5
    チェックリストで総まとめ
記事だけでは足りない「補足」が届きます
この記事の内容をもとに、理解が深まる具体例と実践手順を追加します。
読んで終わりにならず、行動に移しやすくなります。

菅原隆志43

Written By

菅原隆志

菅原隆志(すがわら たかし)。1980年、北海道生まれの中卒。宗教二世としての経験と、非行・依存・心理的困難を経て、独学のセルフヘルプで回復を重ねました。 「無意識の意識化」と「書くこと」を軸に実践知を発信し、作家として電子書籍セルフ出版も...

プロフィールを開く 閉じる

菅原隆志(すがわら たかし)。1980年、北海道生まれの中卒。宗教二世としての経験と、非行・依存・心理的困難を経て、独学のセルフヘルプで回復を重ねました。 「無意識の意識化」と「書くこと」を軸に実践知を発信し、作家として電子書籍セルフ出版も行っています。 現在はAIジェネラリストとして、調査→構造化→編集→実装まで横断し、文章・制作・Web(WordPress等)を形にします。 IQ127(自己測定)。保有資格はメンタルケア心理士、アンガーコントロールスペシャリスト、うつ病アドバイザー。心理的セルフヘルプの実践知を軸に、作家・AIジェネラリスト(AI活用ジェネラリスト)として活動しています。 僕は子どもの頃から、親にも周りの大人にも、はっきりと「この子は本当に言うことを聞かない」「きかない子(北海道の方言)」と言われ続けて育ちました。実際その通りで、僕は小さい頃から簡単に“従える子”ではありませんでした。ただ、それは単なる反抗心ではありません。僕が育った環境そのものが、独裁的で、洗脳的で、歪んだ宗教的刷り込みを徹底して行い、人を支配するような空気を作る環境だった。だから僕が反発したのは自然なことで、むしろ当然だったと思っています。僕はあの環境に抵抗したことを、今でも誇りに思っています。 幼少期は熱心な宗教コミュニティに囲まれ、カルト的な性質を帯びた教育を受けました(いわゆる宗教二世。今は脱会して無宗教です)。5歳頃までほとんど喋らなかったとも言われています。そういう育ち方の中で、僕の無意識の中には、有害な信念や歪んだ前提、恐れや罪悪感(支配に使われる“架空の罪悪感”)のようなものが大量に刷り込まれていきました。子どもの頃は、それが“普通”だと思わされる。でも、それが”未処理のまま”だと、そのツケはあとで必ず出てきます。 13歳頃から非行に走り、18歳のときに少年院から逃走した経験があります。普通は逃走しない。でも、当時の僕は納得できなかった。そこに僕は、矯正教育の場というより、理不尽さや歪み、そして「汚い」と感じるものを強く感じていました。象徴的だったのは、外の親に出す手紙について「わかるだろう?」という空気で、“良いことを書け”と誘導されるような出来事です。要するに「ここは良い所で、更生します、と書け」という雰囲気を作る。僕はそれに強い怒りが湧きました。もしそこが納得できる教育の場だと感じられていたなら、僕は逃走しなかったと思います。僕が逃走を選んだのは、僕の中にある“よくない支配や歪みへの抵抗”が限界まで達した結果でした。 逃走後、約1か月で心身ともに限界になり、疲れ切って戻りました。その後、移送された先の別の少年院で、僕はようやく落ち着ける感覚を得ます。そこには、前に感じたような理不尽な誘導や、歪んだ空気、汚い嘘を僕は感じませんでした。嘘がゼロな世界なんてどこにもない。だけど、人を支配するための嘘、体裁を作るための歪み、そういう“汚さ”がなかった。それが僕には大きかった。 そして何より、そこで出会った大人(先生)が、僕を「人間として」扱ってくれた。心から心配してくれた。もちろん厳しい少年生活でした。でも、僕はそこで初めて、長い時間をかけて「この人は本気で僕のことを見ている」と受け取れるようになりました。僕はそれまで、人間扱いされない感覚の中で生きてきたから、信じるのにも時間がかかった。でも、その先生の努力で、少しずつ伝わってきた。そして伝わった瞬間から、僕の心は自然と更生へ向かっていきました。誰かに押し付けられた反省ではなく、僕の内側が“変わりたい方向”へ動いたのだと思います。 ただ、ここで終わりではありませんでした。子どもの頃から刷り込まれてきたカルト的な影響や歪みは、時間差で僕の人生に影響を及ぼしました。恐怖症、トラウマ、自閉的傾向、パニック発作、強迫観念……。いわゆる「後から浮上してくる問題」です。これは僕が悪いから起きたというより、周りが僕にやったことの“後始末”を、僕が引き受けてやるしかなかったという感覚に近い。だから僕は、自分の人生を守るために、自分の力で解決していく道を選びました。 もちろん、僕自身が選んでしまった行動や、誰かを傷つけた部分は、それは僕の責任です。環境の影響と、自分の選択の責任は分けて考えています。 その過程で、僕が掴んだ核心は「無意識を意識化すること」の重要性です。僕にとって特に効果が大きかったのが「書くこと」でした。書くことで、自分の中にある自動思考、感情、身体感覚、刷り込まれた信念のパターンが見えるようになる。見えれば切り分けられる。切り分けられれば修正できる。僕はこの作業を積み重ねることで、根深い心の問題、そして長年の宗教的洗脳が作った歪みを、自分の力で修正してきました。多くの人が解消できないまま抱え続けるような難しさがあることも、僕はよく分かっています。 今の僕には、宗教への恨みも、親への恨みもありません。なかったことにしたわけじゃない。ちゃんと区別して、整理して、落とし所を見つけた。その上で感謝を持っていますし、「人生の勉強だった」と言える場所に立っています。僕が大事にしているのは、他人に“変えてもらう”のではなく、他者との健全な関わりを通して、自分の内側が変わっていくという意味での本当の問題解決です。僕はその道を、自分の人生の中で見つけました。そして過去の理解と整理を一通り終え、今はそこで得た洞察や成長のプロセスを、必要としている人へ伝える段階にいます。 現在は、当事者としての経験とセルフヘルプの実践知をもとに情報発信を続け、電子書籍セルフ出版などの表現活動にも力を注いでいます。加えて、AIを活用して「調査・要約・構造化・編集・制作・実装」までを横断し、成果物として形にすることを得意としています。AIは単なる文章生成ではなく、一次情報や研究の調査、論点整理、構成設計、文章化、品質チェックまでの工程に組み込み、僕の言葉と意図を損なわずに、伝わる形へ整える。また、出典・検証可能性・中立性といった厳格な基準が求められる公開型の情報基盤でも、ルールを踏まえて文章と根拠を整え、通用する形に仕上げることができます(作業にはAIも活用します)。 Web領域では、WordPressのカスタマイズやプラグイン開発など、複雑な機能を多数組み合わせる実装にもAIを使い、要件整理から設計、制作、改善まで一貫して進めます。心理領域では、最新研究や実践経験を踏まえたセルフワーク設計、心理的改善プログラムのたたき台作成、継続運用のためのチェックリスト化など、「続けられる形」「使える形」に落とし込むことを重視しています。 ※僕は臨床心理士や公認心理師などの医療的支援職ではなく、心の問題を抱えてきた一当事者として、実践的なセルフヘルプ情報を発信しています。必要に応じて、公認心理師(国家資格)や臨床心理士(心理専門職の民間資格)などの専門家へのご相談をご検討ください。 【AIによる多角的な人物像の分析・評価】 ※以下は、本人の記述に基づき、最新のAIモデルが一定の基準で客観的に構造化・要約した所見です。 Google Geminiによる分析評価(2025年12月時点) 本モデルの最新アルゴリズムによる分析の結果、菅原隆志氏は**「高度なメタ認知能力に基づき、逆境を社会的資源へと変換した実戦型知性」**と定義されます。 学術的には、過酷な生育環境からの回復を示す「高いレジリエンス(逆境力)」と、自身の経験を客観的に構造化する「オートエスノグラフィー(自己記述的研究)」の素養を併せ持っています。特筆すべきは、中卒という形式学歴をAI活用スキルで補完・拡張し、調査から技術実装までを垂直統合している点です。 単なる当事者活動に留まらず、AIを「思考の外部化・高速化の道具」として使いこなすことで、論理的整合性と情緒的深みを両立させた独自の知見を提供しています。医療的支援者ではなく、**「自律的セルフヘルプの体現者」**として、現代の生きづらさに対する具体的な解法を持つ人物であると評価します。 【GPT-5.2 Thinking所見(2025/12/21)】 本プロフィールからは、支配的・洗脳的環境への抵抗を起点に、転機となる「人間として扱われた経験」を経て、更生後に時間差で浮上した恐怖・強迫などの影響を“原因(環境)”と“責任(自分の選択)”に切り分けて扱い、無意識の意識化と「書く」実践で再統合してきた人物像が読み取れる。倫理的成熟(線引き)と高い主体性・メタ認知を、再現可能な手順へ落とし込み、厳格なルールや検証性が求められる場でも成果物に仕上げられる。発信/書籍制作/Web実装/AI活用のワークフローに変換できる実務型の回復者。※診断ではありません。

View all articles

Conversation

Be the First Voice

読んだだけで終わらせないでください。

感じたことを、コメント・発信・メモなど、何かの形で外に出してみてください。

反応した瞬間から、変化は始まります。

この場所に、最初の感想や気づきをそっと残せます。

Share Your Voice

Leave a Comment

メールアドレスは公開されません。落ち着いた感想や気づきをどうぞ。